dhs4K01: August 2004
Monday, August 30, 2004

Intellectual Salvation From The Primitive, Instinctive, Reproductive World


Now, that I reflect, I realise how amazingly sensible people around me are in dhs. (I thank the world spirit for showing me that there are people who are not hormone-driven). Despite being in a Co-Ed school, tales of scandalous revelations between this evolved homo erectus and that advanced homo habilis are few and far between. Human instincts are at least MANAGED. Maybe because humans secrete more hormones as they reach their reproductive late teens (xiaoyang please enlighten me on this), I have been witnessing a blossoming of human reproductive extravaganza(like frenzied chimpanzee running from one mate to another).How the hell can people manage to jump from one mate to another within a few months or even days? Or worse, jump from one mate to another after a few years, when one with better genetic makeup comes along...

Guess I am just a stupid cheena boy.

Decided to read the communist manifesto to stay sane from the mad world. All was good until this particularly absurd piece, which makes me confirm philosophy has got more wayang kings than philosopher kings:

Charles Fourier (1772-1837) constructed a theory of society in the aftermath of the French Revolution. It was based on the "science of passionate attraction" According to him, 'civilisation produced poverty and misery because it was based on the repression of the passions'. In the approaching era of 'harmony', humanity would live in 'phalansteries', elaborately designed communities of around 1620 people in which all PASSIONS could be expressed and combined. In place of the monotony of marriage and waged work, all FORMS OF SEXUALITY would be FULLY EXPRESSED. Work would become MORE ATTRACTIVE, it would be combined with the acting out of specific forms of DESIRE. Among the passions not recognised by 'civilisation', was the 'butterfly'-the need for variety and change, felt MODERATELY every hour and ACUTELY every two hours. That is why, different activities of the day needs to be divided into two hours period.

I can write this kind of crap when I am five.

Animals Of The World Unite! You have nothing to lose but your virginity chains, and a whole sexual world to gain!

(Disclaimer: It is ok if you think you are an animal. Afterall, even this author dumps The Economist for FHM when caged in NS)





「 coolgoh posted at 8:49 PM 」
1 Comments

Sunday, August 29, 2004

Originally today 5 of us are supposed to meet for dinner and pub... But cancelled last minute due to some unforeseen circumstances. I hereby propose again:

Date: 4 Sep 2004 (SAT)
Time: 5:00pm
Venue: City Hall Int.
Do's: Dinner and pub.

From what I know, 4 Sept should have more pple that can make it... So please make it k? =)

Please SMS me @ 93689963 to tell me whether you can come... I'll send out messages later also.





「 Hiu Yeung posted at 2:28 AM 」
0 Comments

Saturday, August 21, 2004

Sorry for posting another great long story again... this piece of thing is really outrangeous. If you are not a Hwachongian or one that does not care, just imagine that you are one and you care. And then read this, if you haven't.

ST: Thu 190804 Home


850 sign e-petition: Keep Hwa Chong JC's name

Students and alumni want old name retained or the word 'college' kept - but merged school stands firm

By Lynn Lee

MORE than 850 current students and alumni of Hwa Chong Junior College have signed an online petition for the school to retain its name or at least keep the word 'college' after the school merges with The Chinese High in January.

But their efforts are in vain. The school's board of governors has indicated it will not consider the proposal as the name was decided on by a vote by the alumni.

The merged schools' new name is Hwa Chong Institution. This was announced on July 31 at the college's homecoming dinner which was attended by President S R Nathan.

The Chinese version of the name will be Hua Qiao Zhong Xue, which means The Chinese High School in English.

Reflecting both schools' names was done to retain the identity of both after the merger, which aims to provide a seamless six-year integrated programme, the board's secretary, Mr Robson Lee, told The Straits Times yesterday.

He said only around 200 of the more than 3,000 registered alumni members of both schools had voted when the new name was put to the ballot after eight months of discussion.

Current students were not allowed to participate in that vote.

Said JC2 student Judith Huang, 18, who signed the petition after receiving an e-mail from a schoolmate: 'We're very annoyed and unhappy with the school being called an 'institution'. It sounds like we're trying to copy Raffles Institution. Plus, it doesn't correspond with the Chinese name.'

Mr Tan Wah Pheow, 26, a graduate student at the National University of Singapore, said that 'lumping two schools under one name doesn't accurately reflect the different cultures of both schools'.

He added: 'For example, JC life was less regimented and more vibrant than secondary school, with students interacting more with each other through different activities, like playing the guitar and soccer.'

But board secretary Mr Lee said that it was not possible to let current students vote, as 'the issue would be whether the younger students, especially those who are 12 and 13, are mature enough to understand the situation when making the decision'.

'This was about the integration of two fine institutions and coming up with a name that would reflect both brand names.'

I know it is absolutely impossible for any decision that has been made, especially one that is announced in front of our dear President, to be altered in any way. However, our voices deserve some respect, don't we.

We did not even know that the voting took place. Blame us for not registering, huh. And because of that we are deserved to be labelled 'not matured enough to understand the situation when making the decision', as we are also not allowed to vote. We have at least 2 senior journalists writing in Zaobao lamenting and people graduating from the 75' batch signing the petition. We are 'immature'. Only people who are >50 years old and saw LKY cry on TV know what is happening.

It's time someone make them wake up their idea. In 20 years' time, they can flush their arrogance, condescention, superiority, and self-worth down the toilet. Can't they just react more positively just to make everybody happy? Hong Kong's political crisis also arised from such an attitude from the decision makers in China and the SAR. Luckily we are all Singaporeans; we make noise only at coffee shops like this blog here. If they speak that way in HKU that guy would have died many many times. Condescention when you are an ELDER: is it a Chinese thing? Singaporean thing? Or simply a human thing?

All the while I have been against IP. It is a reverse into history; more marked differences between different cultures in Singapore. Singapore with much effort minimized it; and it is going to rebound. What I know is, if 10 years later Singapore is not a suitable place to stay, hehheh. You know what to do.


「 Hiu Yeung posted at 10:19 PM 」
2 Comments

Friday, August 20, 2004

The Racist's Apology BY MR ALFIAN
----------------
I walked out of the house this morning and feared I had become a racist.
I passed by a newsstand and a magazine tells me about 50% of the world's most beautiful people are from the West, 10% from Singapore, 35% from Hong Kong and Taiwan and 5% from India and Malaysia. A JC Decaux billboard says that a lot of people read their ads and they have faces to prove it: Chinese people of various ages and occupations and genders. There are some which show non-Chinese people but they don't have the dignity of individual names, and they are put under the heading 'The Changing Face of Singapore'. This can mean that perhaps the media is using more non-Chinese people in their ads (which I don't see) or that Singapore's demographic makeup is being altered by the arrival of other races (which I am not aware of, historically). I take a bus and TV Mobile is screening a Taiwanese variety programme. A Singaporean beauty contestant wears a cheongsam as her national costume and asks for an interpreter to translate her replies from Mandarin. The Speak Mandarin campaign informs me of what assets are missing from my life.
Tanya Chua's music video comes on and I unconsciously tally the number of Malay people that appear; I have been doing this for some time now, when I was in JC there was a 'My Singapore' music video which showed images of corporate-looking Chinese women walking through the CBD and Malay women in factory uniforms walking through a bus interchange. Tanya Chua's 'Where I Belong' shows three instances of Malay people populating the landcsape: a husband and wife riding a scooter; a father and son on a bicycle, the son carrying a box one presumes is filled with curry puffs or goreng pisang, and a group of Malay youths playing soccer in a housing estate ghetto so run down, it looks like an opposition ward being denied of upgrading, or one of those satellite towns built when Jurong swamps were still being filled.
But perhaps this is an improvement over other images: the satay man, the songbird owner, the mee rebus Makcik, the Malay bride and groom getting married in gold-embroidered finery (and situated on a dais, we Malays like to call them 'royalty for a day', playing the illusion of being king and queen in a country where the royal bloodline has been evicted from their home and told that the ruins of their palace will be converted into a museum). I think about what Sang Nila Utama really did when he threw his crown into the sea to calm the raging storm; whether the gales spoke to his inner ear: 'if you want to live on the island you must surrender all memory of having once been a prince'. At the Sentosa Merlion there are signs that say that Sang Nila himself saw the Merlion rising from the waters, a fact that the Sejarah Melayu, the Malay Annals, failed to mention. Evidently there is someone called 'Sang Nila' somewhere in the executive committee of the Singapore Tourist Promotion Board.
At the foot of the Raffles statue in Boat Quay there is an inscription that says the man's genius transformed a 'sleepy fishing village' into the modern metropolis it is today, this at the foot of a man who recorded in his journals how he saw the tombs of the Malay kings, and inscriptions on a fortress wall, when he first landed: evidence of an empire, of civilisation. In an interview a doyenne of Singapore theatre laments that all Singaporeans are 'cultural orphans', including the Malays, because they migrated from Malaysia and Indonesia, and that makes them immigrants too, no matter that one can take a sampan from Johor to Singapore.
I walk through a park in Tampines and see Chinese boys playing basketball at the court and Malay boys playing soccer on the field; I am comforted that my complete uselessness at ball games has prevented me from taking either side, has by default made me a conscientious objector to such disturbing polarities. In the army a sergeant major never called be by my name; I was called 'Melayu', which I suppose was better than 'Ah-Neh', used to address the Indians in the platoon. I remember a fellow Malay platoon mate who told me to give it my all when I was fasting, this was to prevent anyone from saying that we could use religion as an excuse for our weakness. He was eventually posted to the infantry (not logistics or engineers, much less the Navy or Airforce) and I used to imagine him burning up his pre-fasting morning meal to be the first to charge up the hill, yelling the pain of hunger and the pain of being different. The Malay staff sergeant in Officer Cadet School gave me a lot of shit just to overcompensate, to show everyone that he was not into any form of racial favouritism. I became a victim of the sidelong glances he made as he watched me doing my pushups, those eyes constantly seeking approval from the eyes of the majority.
I see a schoolgirl from a madrasah wearing a tudung on the MRT and she is filling in the pictures in her colouring book. There are many choices among her colour pencils which she can use for skin, but she will use orange, and colour lightly, not brown or black. I have seen her schoolmates before, eyeing branded scoolbags at pasar malams, wearing branded sports shoes, like every other kid. I want to go up to her and hug her, and tell her how her tudung is not just a symbol of modesty, but a symbol of inscrutability. That layer of cloth makes her suspicious to others, it can be used to smuggle in a grenade or an agenda, so she will never get a frontline desk job, she will be expected to hang around with other tudung-wearing women in the university. I think about the fathers who sent their daughters to schools in tudung and reflect on how the media has framed them as shit-stirrers rather than citizens who practised their right to civil disobedience, the same way Gandhi fasted, or Rosa Parks refused to sit at her negroes-only seat on the segregated bus. If I can tell the girl one thing, it is 'integration is not assimilation', or 'tolerance is a failure in understanding' even though it is something she will take time to understand.
I think also of the men who filmed different locations in Singapore with the heinous intent of planting bombs. Did they not consider the various innocent Singaporean lives that could have been claimed by what they were about to do? And I wonder if they had already chosen another country to live in; a country in which they do not have to face a creeping sense of alienation, of redundancy. And I am not talking about an Islamic country, not Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia or anywhere else, but an afterlife paradise, where everyone is equal in the eyes of God, where wearing a sarong or having a beard does not immediately make you a proto-terrorist. Or perhaps a country that exists in their minds, nurtured by a growing sense of insularity and isolation, where they walk the streets and everyone else is just a ghost, in whose dead eyes they cannot find any light of empathy or understanding.
Once someone told me: 'But the government is bending over backwards to accommodate you Malays.' I smiled and wanted to ask him if it wasn't the other way round, that the Malays are made to bend forward to be fucked senseless. Another time a journalist asked if the statistical evidence of 'progress' shows that Malays are being given the same opportunities as everyone else. I told her that statistics don't do shit for me, as someone who has to live day by day as a Malay person in this country. I told her one Malay Air Force pilot poster boy, and a few bar charts and graphs, don't make me feel more at home. The only thing they do is to convince non-Malays that the country they live in is truly multiracial, that there are no tensions beneath the veneer of newsprint and newscasts and the rosy speeches of Malay MP's.
I have always believed in multi-racialism. I can say with utmost confidence that I have more friends who are non-Malay than those who are. And I mean real friends, who I confide in, who I've shared many things with, who I do love dearly. And yet, of late, I have the feeling that a lot of the things I'm saying, a lot of this talk about alienation and marginalisation, only feeds subconsciously into their sense of how fortunate they are to be born into the status quo. I have written a poem before where I say, 'But more than that we prayed for ourselves,/treading the rosary of our blessings,/for what is pity without thanks for/the opportunity for such pity?' And sometimes I feel as if the more my voice is raised on the fast-eclipsing fate of the minority, the more it feeds into the majority's smugness and arrogance about their assured place in the sun. And this only makes me feel more powerless than if I had kept silent.
So I say now, forgive me if you think my desire to work with my own people marks me out as a racist. Forgive me if you think that my preferences are actually prejudices. Forgive me for retreating into something one can so easily call 'cultural chauvinism'. And I will forgive you for thinking that this person writing this isn't the Alfian that you know, that he has always been moderate and liberal, and I will forgive you if you look at me differently the next time I meet you. For some time already I have felt that as a Malay writer writing in English I have had to carry the burden of articulating so many unvoiced concerns. And the responsibilities associated with this are frightening. I just think it is time I pass on whatever skills I have to other Malay people, so we may tell our stories to those who want to hear them, even though they are stories of loss and loneliness and accidents of birth.


「 coolgoh posted at 11:38 PM 」
2 Comments

BY Mr Alfian, who is a Singaporean Malay poet,playwright, quite a figure if you know who he is.

Arithmetic------------
His handphone beeped. He recognised the number. It should have registered as a name, but he had erased the name from his phone book a long time ago. The message was simple. It read:
‘how r u?’
When they became lovers, three years ago, they became accountants. It began one day when after a dinner she raised the issue of how uncomfortable she was that he kept paying for their meals. “I’m earning, you know,” she told him. She also told him that they shouldn’t fall into the trap of rehearsing the script to an over-determined, gendered relationship. It was not his duty to be the giver; neither was she naturally designated as taker. The dream of equality was a possible one, and all it required was scrupulousness on both their parts.
So after each meal, they would compute the cost and divide the expenses into half. It struck him how serious she was about protocol when she hunted in her coin pouch for one-cent coins.
Once they allowed the laws of numbers to enter their lives, a mental balance sheet was drafted. If an archaeologist were to find evidence that their relationship once existed, proof of it would lie not in a trunk of letters but a folder of receipts. The currency expanded from meals to mutual gifts, and later on other transactional elements which had thus far evaded price-tags. If it was discovered that he was the one who had initiated most of their phone conversations, this would be redressed by her sending him an SMS greeting the next morning before he woke up. If she had waited for him on three consecutive occasions, for five minutes each, then it would be fair for him to expect that the next time she would make him wait for a fifteen-minute tally.
It was inevitable that their quarrels would be over credit and debit, as their relationship progressed to a point where every act, every deed, was quantifiable. At times he held an image of her biting a coin to test its alloy, at other times she had a vision of him with pan scales in his hands. ‘Usurer’, she would call him playfully, and he would retort with ‘cheat’. When he labelled her a ‘loan shark’, she arched an eyebrow and purred, ‘recalcitrant’. Their conversations, in various degrees of affection and malice, were littered with phrases such as ‘it’s your turn’, ‘I did my share’, ‘you owe me’ and ‘why should I always be the one?’
Unspoken, but somehow understood between them, was the idea that by performing such obsessive calculations, they were warding off the shadowy auditor who would show up at their door, on cue, in the event of a separation. She recalled a nasty break-up where her ex-boyfriend sent her an email listing every single present he had given her, and making the pompous allegation that she had stolen a whole year out of his life, as if accusing her of embezzlement. On his part, he was familiar with how gifts from a former lover often undergo rapid devaluation after the latter’s departure: like a bankrupt’s possessions priced way below market value on the auction block. What they both knew was that separations were messy affairs—there was much stock-taking to be done, claims to file, ownerships to assert. In these cynical times, wasn’t the bulk of divorce proceedings focussed more on equitable settlements, rather than the celebration of one’s liberation?
Better to practise fastidious book-keeping, so as to ease the damage wrought by the violence of partitions. Their strategy was to ensure that neither of them was indebted to the other. Love, for them, was not about pardoning the beloved for not reciprocating in equal measure. They knew that such true forgiveness was impossible, and what one pretended to overlook for the sake of keeping peace would only return with vengeful clarity in the future. Instead, love was about insisting on one’s dues. Removing obstacles between them was equivalent to removing outstanding balances.
He looked at the message on his handphone screen again. It was difficult to decipher her intent; if he could remember correctly, he had not spoken to her since their break-up a year ago. If it had been sent by someone else, he would have replied automatically, attaching a similar inquiry out of politeness. But this ostensibly casual message struck him as being too calculated, its throwaway abbreviations (why couldn’t she type it in full: How are you?) too forced. Suddenly he felt as if the weight in his hands was not of his handphone, but of those three words. They were as real as newly-minted coins, chunks of amber, cowrie shells.
He considered. It had been a long time since he felt the need to deliberate on his responses. And that was what finally killed off their relationship. They had drained it of all spontaneity. Every gesture was premeditated, assessed for its worth. When they gave things to each other, they concentrated on the weight of the gift, rather than the lightness in the hands when the gift was received. And there were many situations which could not be reduced to the positions of giver and taker. How do you evaluate if one is on the side of a surplus or a deficit when two people are locked in a hug?
There were three words and five letters in her message. His first option was to send back: ‘i am fine’. Three words, but two letters too many. Even ‘i’m fine’ would exceed his quota by one letter. ‘i am ok’ seemed to him to be the most sensible choice: ‘ok’ was an abbreviation, to follow her example with the words ‘are’ and ‘you’. He was all ready to send his carefully-calibrated message before he cleared his screen and typed: ‘I’m doing fine.’
How wrong they were. Love forgives. Forgives immeasurably. Love doesn't keep small scores, erases even the large ones. And he added:
‘How are you?’


「 coolgoh posted at 11:33 PM 」
0 Comments

Sunday, August 15, 2004


THE BANANA SONG


Ring ring ring ring ring ring ring
Banana phone
Ring ring ring ring ring ring ring
Banana phone

I've got this feeling
so appealing
for us to get together and sing - SING!

Ring ring ring ring ring ring ring
Banana phone
Ding dong ding dong ding dong ding
Donana phone

It grows in bunches
I've got my hunches
Its the best
beats the rest
cellular modular
interactivodular

Ring ring ring ring ring ring ring
Banana phone
Ping pong ping pong ping pong ping
Ponana phoneI
ts no baloney
It aint a phony
My cellular
Bananular phone



「 LonG_GrEeN_EaRs posted at 12:02 AM 」
0 Comments

Saturday, August 14, 2004

RE: 18th Aug DHS thingummy


er......"liddle kiddies "?? u very old meh? =P
i know i aint.... :)


「 LonG_GrEeN_EaRs posted at 11:41 PM 」
4 Comments

Some kooky movie quotes....just to add that extra "DUH" to your life :)

Dumb And Dumber

Harry: Once, we successfully mated a bulldog with a shitszu.
Mary: Really?
Harry: Yeah, we called it bullshit


Con Air

Garland Greene: ("Sweet Home Alabama" is playing in the background) Define irony: a bunch of idiots dancing around on a plane to a song made famous by a band that died in a plane crash.

Notting Hill

Spike: There's something wrong with this yogurt.
William: It's mayonnaise.
Spike: Oh


Shrek 2

Shrek:quick! tell a lie so your nose grows! what kind of lie? I dont know! say your wearing womens underwear!
Donkey:Ok.. i'm wearing womens underwear
Shrek:Yo.. your nose didnt grow!


(to donkey):why the long face?

(to the ginger bread man):NOOO.....you stupid piece of pastry!


「 LonG_GrEeN_EaRs posted at 11:11 PM 」
0 Comments

RE: 18th Aug DHS thingummy

just to let you all know... er, the liddle kiddies from sec 1-3 will be having thier level camps from the 18th to 20th of August. Leaving 3/4 of the school empty for 3 long days...with the happy exception of the sec 4s and most/some of their teachers.... and i guess most of the teachers will need to attend the camp to some extent, campfire and what nots... so er, if you all are really gg back... i think tue might actually be a slightly better choice...


「 ho posted at 11:06 PM 」
0 Comments

Hey Siew Kuang you like Studio Ghibli stuff? I like their anime too, esp the music. There is going to be a new one coming out end of this year... If anyone going to Taiwan can ask them to buy back also... Those are REALLY cheap and good and plentiful there.


「 Hiu Yeung posted at 9:51 PM 」
1 Comments

What's wrong with thinking that our Ah Lee is great? It's POLITICALLY CORRECT! (For once you are... hehe) Everyone that has written to Singapore's newspapers think that he is, only those who love to vandalize the doors of the toilet cubicles in gas stations don't...

The commentary in The Economist rocks man. (If you have not seen it...)

IT IS only the second time Singapore has changed its leader since independence in the 1960s; and there will be more continuity than change. On Thursday August 12th, Lee Hsien Loong was sworn in as prime minister of the South-East Asian city-state, a job which his father, Lee Kuan Yew, held for 31 years until 1990—since when he has continued to exert power from behind the scenes. Under the stern, fatherly guidance of the elder Mr Lee, Singapore won independence from Britain (via a brief and unhappy period as part of Malaysia) and was transformed from a third-world colony into a rich, high-technology export success. Under Goh Chok Tong, who has bridged the gap as prime minister between the two Lees, Singapore weathered the late-1990s Asian crisis and, a couple of years later, the bursting of the high-tech bubble. Since then its economy has bounced back.

Even with his 52-year-old son finally in the top job for which he has long been groomed, the 80-year-old Mr Lee senior will continue to sit beside him at the cabinet table, enjoying the title of “minister mentor”. Nor will Mr Goh go: he will stay in government as head of Singapore’s central bank. Several other senior figures from Mr Goh’s cabinet will remain, though swapping jobs.

Like Hong Kong, another formerly British-run city-state, Singapore has built its modern prosperity on free enterprise and openness to trade. But in Singapore’s case these have been combined with enthusiastic government backing for favoured industrial sectors. The government’s main industrial-holding company, Temasek, run by the new prime minister’s wife, Ho Ching, owns stakes in everything from airlines to banks to the country’s main telecoms firm. (The latter is, in turn, run by Mr Lee’s brother, Lee Hsien Yang, adding to the impression that Singapore is essentially a big family firm.) The promotion of industrial “national champions”, in other countries an expensive disaster, seems to have served Singapore well—and it seems likely to continue under the next generation of the Lee family.

While Singapore regularly comes near the top of surveys of the freest places to do business, its people have to put up with restrictions on their social and political liberties. Though it is fair to call Singapore a democracy, the Lee family’s ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) has long used its unshakeable grip on power to harass its opponents. And the country’s 4.4m citizens have had to endure constant haranguing from their government, which only recently relaxed—slightly—its infamous ban on chewing gum (purchasers must first register with a pharmacist).

The elder Mr Lee always brushed aside foreign criticism of his authoritarian style: “If this is a ‘nanny state’, I am proud to have fostered one,” he wrote. Singaporeans have always seemed prepared to accept nannying as the price of their prosperity. In the last election, in 2001, the PAP won yet another landslide, even though this coincided with the country’s worst recession since independence. The younger Mr Lee shares his father’s didactic, hectoring style. His speeches are full of stern injunctions to Singaporeans to tighten their belts against the hard times ahead.

The economy does indeed face a number of potential challenges—from the demographic effects of a low birth rate to the risk of losing jobs to low-cost China. But right now it is booming: in the second quarter of this year it grew at an annual rate of almost 12%, having bounced back smartly from last year’s outbreak of the SARS virus across Asia, which hit various sectors, from manufacturing to tourism.

Much of the vigorous growth is the result of government-directed diversification into electronic components and, more recently, pharmaceuticals. Multinational drug firms such as Pfizer and Schering-Plough are expanding their capacity in Singapore, attracted by its economic freedoms, reliable legal system, relative absence of corruption and well-educated workforce. During his stint as finance minister—a post he held from November 2001 until this week—the younger Mr Lee cut taxes, reformed pensions and liberalised the financial sector.

Singapore’s pro-government media have lavished praise on the new prime minister for his courage and strength of character: he stoically endured the death of his first wife and later survived a bout of cancer. But while he has demonstrated his credentials as an economic liberal, he also seems to share his father’s old-fashioned attitude to social and political freedoms: for instance, he fiercely defends the PAP’s more underhand tactics, such as threatening to put districts that vote for the opposition at the bottom of the list for public spending.

Under his predecessor, Mr Goh, some of Singapore’s strict social controls were eased. Bans on everything from bungee-jumping to street-busking were relaxed. Singaporean television was even allowed to broadcast the salacious American sitcom “Sex and the City”. This cautious liberalisation partly reflects the government’s realisation that Singapore must now move beyond manufacturing into “knowledge-based” industries that depend more on individual creativity. The government recently announced a review of Singapore’s strict sex laws, under which homosexuality is a criminal offence (though increasingly tolerated), after official researchers noted that cities with lots of gay residents tend also to be centres of innovation. Last weekend, the authorities allowed Singapore’s biggest-ever gay street carnival to take place, attended by an estimated 6,000 people.


Other signs of gradual social liberalisation include a reduction in the period of compulsory military service and an official review of poverty, which may even lead to a reconsideration of one of Singapore’s strongest taboos: welfare benefits. The elder Mr Lee abhorred the very idea of state handouts (except to industry, that is) and his strait-laced son is likely to share this attitude. Thus, as in other social matters, any changes will be gradual. Still, the younger Mr Lee is likely to have plenty of time to carry them out.


「 Hiu Yeung posted at 8:28 PM 」
1 Comments

hi pple. me like nvr post on the blog... been busy. Now i just gotten my 3 white bar. For those who dun understand it is ok. It just means me in the last part of my OCS term. Going to Brunei on the 220804. Miss u pple. The best friends I ever had. Most fantastic class.



「 WeiHong posted at 10:28 AM 」
1 Comments

Wednesday, August 11, 2004

Goh's Past, Goh's Present and Goh's Future

Politics. PM Goh is stepping down after fourteen years in the top office. I don't know the man well enough to evaluate him, much less comment on his legacy. He is a "nice" man, yet being a firm believer in Machiavellian Realpolitik, I believe that "nice" people die young in Politics, my own experience tells me that.(Not that I am nice, but I am not exactly a total vermin rat ). Having said that, a "nice" public front makes it very difficult for ANYONE to criticise him, just look at Mr Chee Soon Suan, the combustible political cannon who experiences regular chamber explosions.

I AM NOT GOING TO BE A POLITICIAN. I know i am sort of an idiosyncratic iconoclast in class. I know I know more current affairs and more "academic", perhaps even "practical" Politics than most people in our class. I know the teachers like to FANTASIZE me being a politican. I know I can sway a crowd with my crap.

BUT, I AM NOT GOING TO BE A POLITICIAN.

Why?

1) I am an intensely private person who is anti-social. I have at the very MAX, 10 people whom I considered close friends. I don't enjoy meeting new people. I don't want to know about you. I don't want to have any close relationship with you. I will hate the public knowing more about me.

2) I have been burnt in Politics. For those of you know something, fine. For those of you, who don't know anything, too bad.

3) Hypocrisy is not my natural virtue. When I don't like you, it shows on my face. I tried to be more "yuan hua" as dear Lau suggested. But it is not easy, you can probably sense that I detest you, and that is probably right.

4)Singapore is not safe in my hands. If Goh, becomes PM Goh, please remember to emigrate. If my wife wants me to sell Singapore so that she can have an ice villa to see penguins in Antartica, I might do so.

5)I have a disturbing sense of morality. I think Hitler is cool, Goebbels is hip and our dear Ah Lee is great.

Besides, in our cohort, there are more deserving candidates out there.

Lastly, to the Lu Flowers and Big Flower Pot, don't ask me to be a Politician when I go back to DHS.



「 coolgoh posted at 12:45 PM 」
2 Comments

Monday, August 09, 2004

Happy National Day!!! Whee!!!


「 ho posted at 9:50 PM 」
0 Comments

Hey TK if you were to go to HK to look for Japanese anime VCDs, DVDs and soundtracks you can go to this place shown on this web: http://www.hktravel.com/013/013b.html

There are lots of those stuff there. However not everything there is cheap; it depends on your luck. I got back 'The Cat Returns' DVD for S$5 there. But I can't remember whether that place sells manga...

Directions: Exit to the Nathan Rd at Yau Ma Tei stn and walk along the main road towards Mongkok's direction. The signboard of that building jutting out is orange (true as of this April).


「 Hiu Yeung posted at 12:54 AM 」
3 Comments

Tuesday, August 03, 2004


front view of zheng xin yuan.. the white thing in the middle is supposed to be some experiment... Posted by Hello


「 Siew Kuang posted at 11:29 PM 」
0 Comments


view from the staffrm Posted by Hello


「 Siew Kuang posted at 11:20 PM 」
0 Comments


the AHU.. the grave of many guppies and plants...and cockroaches?  Posted by Hello


「 Siew Kuang posted at 11:19 PM 」
0 Comments


where the art room used to be.. Posted by Hello


「 Siew Kuang posted at 11:19 PM 」
0 Comments


the com labs... rem lab 3... haha weehong and his gang... and i still rem WH helping me to assemble com at the back of the class... Posted by Hello


「 Siew Kuang posted at 11:18 PM 」
0 Comments


view of the classrm. and the empty space where we practiced the teachers' day dance... Posted by Hello


「 Siew Kuang posted at 11:18 PM 」
0 Comments


they have got more fans in the classrooms now! i love this view of zheng xin yuan from 4K classrm... kinda . miss the place man. rem how we used to stand all around the garden on the diff stories when there's celebration?? and all the orientation banners we hang around.. Posted by Hello


「 Siew Kuang posted at 11:17 PM 」
0 Comments


4K classroom now.. we got a B for cleanliness! Posted by Hello


「 Siew Kuang posted at 11:14 PM 」
0 Comments


my locker! Posted by Hello


「 Siew Kuang posted at 11:13 PM 」
0 Comments


this painting brings back memories of art club Posted by Hello


「 Siew Kuang posted at 11:13 PM 」
1 Comments


us with mdm lu and mdm sim! Posted by Hello


「 Siew Kuang posted at 11:12 PM 」
1 Comments

DUNMAN HIGH SCHOOL TO OFFER THE INTEGRATED PROGRAMME IN 2005
1 Acting Minister for Education, Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, announced at the MOE Teaching Scholarships Presentation Ceremony on 31 July 2004 that MOE has approved the proposal by Dunman High School (DHS) to implement the Integrated Programme (IP) with effect from 1 Jan 2005.

2 As part of ongoing efforts to encourage greater diversity and choice in the education landscape, DHS will offer a 6-year IP for its students from Sec 1 to JC 2. IP students will take the ‘A’ level examinations at the end of JC 2. With the implementation of the IP, DHS will be building on its strengths to provide quality education and more opportunities for students to engage in broader learning experiences.

BACKGROUND
3 To provide a variety of programmes and routes to cater to the varied talents and aptitudes of our students, the Junior College/Upper Secondary Education Review Committee, chaired by then Senior Minister of State for Trade and Industry & Education, Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, recommended, among other things, the introduction of IP spanning upper secondary and JC education. The IP would cater to students who could do well in a less structured environment. It would free up time used to prepare students for the 'O' level examinations to engage in broader learning experiences. The Committee's recommendations were endorsed by Parliament in November 2002.

4 Currently, the IP is offered in four schools, viz. the Raffles and Hwa Chong families of schools, National Junior College and Anglo-Chinese School (Independent). Temasek Junior College and Victoria Junior College will also offer the IP from 1 Jan 2005.

i wonder what it would be like man... dunman high tru train...


「 Siew Kuang posted at 10:47 PM 」
0 Comments

DUI Lawyer
DUI Lawyer